Let us assume that we are in the situation where we need to create a function that calculates the absolute value of a number.

When you have a number that is positive, then absolute value of the number is that same number, but if the number is negative, then the absolute value of the number is that number with sign changed.

So, the function, if you work with int data type would be like this:

There could also be a possibility when you don’t want to use the usual data types, but like to use your own custom data type with typedef.

We cannot possibly predict all data types that our function could potentially use. In those situations, “function templates” comes to rescue.

Now it is time to ask yourself, what do we get and what do we lose with this approach.

Well, we gain from point of generality and we lose from point of speed.

In other words, if you need to create faster solution for one data type, don’t use template.

But, if your goal is to create a function that will not care about data types, you should use templates.

As we have seen how we could use template functions to not care about data type, we could use the same trick with C++ classes.

If your C++ supports C11 standard, you can use variadic templates, which has the ability to use more parameters, something like combination of templates and functions of unknown number of arguments.

When you have a number that is positive, then absolute value of the number is that same number, but if the number is negative, then the absolute value of the number is that number with sign changed.

So, the function, if you work with int data type would be like this:

int AbsolteValue( int nNumber) { return (nNumber>0)? nNumber:-nNumber; }But, what if somebody needs the same function with double data type, instead of int? In that case, you can create a function like the following:

double AbsoluteValue( double dNumber) { return (dNumber>0)? dNumber:-dNumber; }In the way same, we can keep creating functions reactively to cover: float, long int, long long int, long double and so on.

There could also be a possibility when you don’t want to use the usual data types, but like to use your own custom data type with typedef.

We cannot possibly predict all data types that our function could potentially use. In those situations, “function templates” comes to rescue.

### C++ Function Template Syntax

There are two acceptable syntaxes:template <class TypeName1, class TypeName2, ...> Or, template <typename Typename1, typename TypeName2>Now, the function could be like this:

tempalte<typename T> T AbsoluteValue( T tNumber) { return (tNumber>0)? tNumber: -tNumber; }So, the algorithm does not depend on data type used in code any more. The algorithm is implemented no matter what data type is used.

Now it is time to ask yourself, what do we get and what do we lose with this approach.

Well, we gain from point of generality and we lose from point of speed.

In other words, if you need to create faster solution for one data type, don’t use template.

But, if your goal is to create a function that will not care about data types, you should use templates.

### C++ Function Template Example Program

The following example C++ program shows how you can use template.#include <iostream> using namespace std; template<typename T> T AbsoluteValue(T tNumber) { return (tNumber>0)? tNumber:-tNumber; } int main( void) { int nNumber1 = 7, nNumber2 = -7; cout<<"Absolute value of " <<nNumber1<<" = " <<AbsoluteValue(nNumber1)<<endl; cout<<"Absolute value of " <<nNumber2<<" = " <<AbsoluteValue(nNumber2)<<endl; double dNumber1 = 7.0923, dNumber2 =-7.0923; cout<<"Absolute value of" <<dNumber1<<" = " <<AbsoluteValue(dNumber1)<<endl; cout<<“Absolute value of " <<dNumber2<<" = " <<AbsoluteValue(dNumber2)<<endl; int iExit; cin>>iExit; return EXIT_SUCCESS; }The output for the above program will be the following:

Absolute value of 7 = 7 Absolute value of -7 = 7 Absolute value of 7.0923 = 7.0923 Absolute value of -7.0923 = 7.0923As you see in the above example, it has only one function, but it will react to any data types.

As we have seen how we could use template functions to not care about data type, we could use the same trick with C++ classes.

If your C++ supports C11 standard, you can use variadic templates, which has the ability to use more parameters, something like combination of templates and functions of unknown number of arguments.